Artwork by Ozias Leduc,  Portrait de Rodolphe Brunet

Ozias Leduc
Portrait de Rodolphe Brunet

oil on board
signed and dated 1897 towards middle right along the edge; signed, titled and dated on multiple gallery labels on the backing on the reverse
11 x 8.5 ins ( 27.9 x 21.6 cms )

Auction Estimate: $7,000.00$5,000.00 - $7,000.00

Price Realized $9,000.00
Sale date: December 6th 2023

Provenance:
The Artist
Rodolphe Brunet, 1897
Rolande Brunet‒Raymond, 1949
Galerie l'Art français, Montreal, 1988
Jean‒Pierre Valentin, Montreal
Acquired by the present Private Collection, September 1997
Exhibited:
“Ozias Leduc, peintre et citoyen de Saint-Hilarie,” Musée d’art de Mont- Saint-Hilaire, Quebec, 1995
“Ozias Leduc: Art Art of Love and Reverie”, Montreal Museum of Fine Arts; travelling to Art Gallery of Ontario, Toronto, 22 February‒19 May 1996, no. 85
“70th Anniversary Exhibition”, Galerie Valentin, Montreal, 8‒25 September 2004
Literature:
“La vie culturelle à Montreal,” vers 1900, reproduced page 64
André Michel, “Ozias Leduc, peintre et citoyen de Saint-Hilaire”, Mont-Saint-Hilaire, 1995, reproduced page 18
Pierre Lambert, “Ozias Leduc: Le peintre en quête de beauté”, Montreal, 2013, reproduced page 55
Monique Lanthier in Laurier Lacroix, “Ozias Leduc: An Art of Love and Reverie”, Montreal, 1996, no. 85, page 120, reproduced page 121
As Monique Lanthier’s shares in her catalogue essay for “Portrait of Rodolphe Brunet” in the catalogue for the 1996 exhibition “Ozias Leduc: An Art of Love and Reverie”:

“Rodolphe Brunet (1860-1949) had published as a poet and journalist before spending seven years in Paris around the turn of the century. It was doubtless in his capacity as chairman of the Société canadienne de Paris that he met Leduc. [...] Around 1893-1894, he left for France, where he became friendly with a number of Canadian writers and artists, and collected their work. They included Raoul Barré, Henri Beau, Joseph-Charles Franchère, Charles Gill, Murray Prendergast, Joseph Saint-Charles and Suzor-Coté.

[In this painting], Leduc freezes a moment of time, in a sfumato effect, with no hint as to place or period save for the clues given by clothes. Meticulous attention is paid to the details - the black suit, the stiff collar, the loosely tied tie with its tiepin - that give the sitter his dandified air. Much struck by Leduc’s meticulous technique, Brunet himself wrote, “I have seen a very well done portrait of his and sketches for paintings that look extremely promising. The rendering is such that the subjects seem alive”, and compared him to the Italian old masters rather than his contemporaries: ‘Mr. Leduc is no admirer of the Impressionist style or of the gallery devoted to the leaders of this new school at the Musée du Luxembourg. He is among those who believe that this gallery might aptly be renamed the Chamber of Horrors. And he is right. His own style is very different.’

Brunet’s opinion was doubtless based on a comparison of the portrait’s highly finished look, the result of innumerable brush strokes, with the looser Impressionist handling, and of his muted palette with their brighter colours. What is more, this was one of the few times that Leduc chose a permanent and sturdy support: a finely finished wood panel like those used by Renaissance painters. For the first time, he signed with a monogram where the initial letter of his first name becomes a circle containing his name and the date the work was executed. Two thirds of the back of the panel is covered with brown on which Leduc painted a miniature landscape in the thickly pigmented manner of his pochades of the 1900s. Lit by twilight colours, a path crosses a field diagonally and disappears into the distance. This tiny landscape is an enigma: is it a reminiscence of a French landscape seen during an outing to the Paris suburbs, or a nostalgic memory of the Richelieu Valley?”

Share this item with your friends

Ozias Leduc
(1864 - 1955) RCA

Born at St. Hilaire, Quebec, he began to paint with Luigi Cappello in the decoration of Saint-Pail l'Ermite church. Cappello was an Italian painter who had done church decoration for many churches in Quebec. Later Leduc became associated with Adolphe rho in the decoration of the church of Yamachiche, including the painting of a copy of Raphael's “Transfiguration” and, a picture entitled “Bapteme du Christ” destined for the church of Saint-Jean-in-Montana, Jerusalem. Although this last painting was done by Leduc it was a commission given to Rho and done in his shops and therefore signed by Rho. An engraving after this painting was made but was not a faithful reproduction of the original work.

Most of Leduc's art training was acquired through the process of observation and self teaching. By the age of twenty-three, Leduc was producing beautiful still life studies bathes in warm candle light or from the light of a distant window. A painting from this period entitled “Les Trois Pommes” was given to Paul-Emile Borduas by the artist as Borduas was his assistant for many years in the decoration of churches and a life long friend.

In 1892, Leduc entered a painting in the Art Association of Montreal annual show and won a prize for the best work done by an artist under thirty. It was during this year and the next that he did decorations for the Joliette Cathedral.

In 1897 he sailed for France in the company of Suzor-Côté. There Leduc became considerably impressed with three lessor known Impressionists, René Ménard, Alfons Mucha and Le Sidaner also Maurice Denis in religious art especially.

He returned to Canada after eight months and set to work on decorations for the church at St. Hilaire. Nothing the effect of the Impressionists on Leduc's work, Jean René Ostiguy explained, “But the techniques of French impressionism, when transplanted to Saint-Hilaire, bore a very different fruit. For Leduc they were the means for weaving reveries and for expressing the tenderness which he felt before all life and all created things. His drawing, the care he devoted to his surfaces, show his early influences. But the real difference came in the handling of light. From him light was the symbol of another, an ideal world. He saw nature in the light of his dreams, and there is good reason for associating him with the surrealist tendency which is sometimes to be found in Renaissance painting. Because of his development took this unusual course, Leduc's paintings are not modern in the ordinary sense. Yet in a deeper sense they are completely contemporary in spirit. His insistence on the poetic basis of art and his strongly personal manner of expression are qualities which contemporary painters revere and seek as essential elements in their work.”

Also commenting on the artists Gilles Corbeil noted, “The extraordinary care which Ozias Leduc lavished on his paintings is almost unbelievable. He seems at every moment to have been conscious of some moral responsibility for the way he treated his canvases and handled his brush and his colours. Nothing was left undone; no care was too great. Everything which went into the making of a picture, from the preparation of the stretcher for the canvas, was the work of his own hands. One begins to wonder what brush could have been soft enough, what palette smooth enough, to have been employed in the creation of such exquisite paintings. But the really touching thing about Leduc is the tenderness, even sanctity, which seems to govern all his work. For him, painting was never merely a manual craft but a flowering character, an act of grace. For him the paint itself seemed sensitive, and perhaps it was for fear of violating it that he treated it with such greatness.” Corbeil went on to explain that throughout his life Leduc painted only some twenty still life studies of simple everyday things such as a candlestick, a loaf of bread, apples, a book, violin, a knife or spoon beside a bowl but he never painted flowers in these studies. Corbeil equated Leduc's treatment of objects with that os jean Baptiste Simeon Chardin, the Frech master who also endowed his still lifes with a certain dignity although Chardin was a more worldly and sophisticated painter. Corbeil thought too, that the enchanted austerity of Leduc's paintings might be better compares to the Dutch still life painter Willem Claesz Heda. Heda, however, unlike Leduc included flowers in his compositions but he achieved that aura of silence that Leduc always created in his still lifes.

During the earlier part of his life, Leduc did a number of portraits as well as landscapes. He made his living mainly from church decorations of which he did more than one hundred and fifty paintings for about twenty-eight cathedrals, churches, or chapels. His portraits and other works were done with oil on paper, oil on cardboard, oil on canvas. He did a number of oil on cardboard paintings. He kept track of his pencil drawings which were at times done on the back of envelopes and sometimes numbered.

In 1916 he was elected Associate of the Royal Canadian Academy and in 1938 received the degree of Doctor Hornoris Causa from the University of Montreal. In addition, he illustrated many novels, poetry books and anthologies.

There have been three important showings of Leduc's work as follows: at the St. Sulpice Library, Montreal in 1916; a retrospective exhibition at the Lycée Pierre Corneille, Montreal in 1954 and a retrospective exhibition organized by Jean René Ostiguy for the National Gallery of Canada which included forty-one oil, charcoal, and coloured crayon drawings and paintings. Leduc was still active at the age of ninety, overseeing the work for the decoration of the church at Almaville-en-Bas near Shawinigan Falls. He died at St. Hyacinthe aged ninety-one. He is represented in the following public collections: Museum of the Province of Quebec; The Montreal Museum of Fine Arts and the National Gallery of Canada.

Source: "A Dictionary of Canadian Artists, Volume I: A-F", compiled by Colin S. MacDonald, Canadian Paperbacks Publishing Ltd, Ottawa, 1977